{"id":113171,"date":"2020-07-06T13:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-07-06T20:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.paloaltonetworks.com\/blog\/?p=113171"},"modified":"2020-07-30T19:49:06","modified_gmt":"2020-07-31T02:49:06","slug":"cortex-mitre-attck-round-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www2.paloaltonetworks.com\/blog\/2020\/07\/cortex-mitre-attck-round-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The Ultimate Guide to the MITRE ATT&CK Round 2 Evaluation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Download your free copy of <\/span><\/i>The Ultimate Guide to the MITRE ATT&CK Round 2 Evaluation <\/span><\/i><\/a>today.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

The Round 2 MITRE ATT&CK Evaluation \u2013 in which endpoint detection and response (EDR) vendors were tested against the attack techniques of the threat actor group known as<\/span> APT29 aka Cozy Bear<\/span><\/a> \u2013 provided objective proof of the detection capabilities of various solutions in the endpoint security market.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

But, as MITRE does not directly rank vendors in their evaluations, the cybersecurity community responded exactly as you\u2019d expect: Each company interpreted the results to position their own solutions as superior. Can you believe it? Everybody won!<\/span><\/p>\n

\"The<\/p>\n

Well, everybody except for perhaps security teams, who are left with mixed messages about the results and about where they should invest to ensure that their companies are protected.<\/span><\/p>\n

We\u2019re super excited that <\/span>Cortex XDR was once again unsurpassed in attack technique coverage<\/span><\/a>. But we know that you need more information than that, so we\u2019ve packaged together a much more comprehensive analysis of the data. As each company and security team has different needs and strategies (and, therefore, different criteria for ranking solutions), we\u2019ve reviewed the MITRE data from a number of different angles in a robust guide to the MITRE Evaluation that will help you determine your own winners, including:<\/span><\/p>\n